The "friendly fire" airstrike that killed
five American soldiers in Afghanistan on June 9 is the first known case of a
battlefield catastrophe that can be linked to automatic defense spending cuts
that greatly curtailed prewar training.
A review of the worst American fratricide in the
long Afghanistan War also shows that the military's official investigation
faults a Green Beret commander, an Air Force air controller and the four-man
crew on the B-1B bomber that conducted the errant strike.
But the investigation, headed by an Air Force
general, does not question the use of a strategic bomber for close air support,
even though experts say the tragedy illustrates why the big plane is misplaced
in that role.
The Washington Times has reviewed the investigation
and interviewed knowledgeable sources to compile a picture of the doomed
operation in southern Afghanistan's Zabul province, as well as the political
and military missteps that precipitated it. Key among them, according to
defense experts, was the use of the strategic bomber.
The B-1B's sheer size required it to fly a wide
orbit of five miles for optimum bombing as it made right turns over the
nighttime battle site. This put it outside the range of night vision goggles.
The goggles were the only equipment the bomber had to identify the infrared
strobe lights worn by U.S. troops to distinguish them from the enemy and to
keep them safe.
The pilot, looking out the right window, tried to
see infrared flashes, apparently unaware that he was too far away. He reported
to the ground controller that he saw no infrared strobes, which became
confirmation that the U.S. troops were the enemy.
This misuse of night vision goggles directly led to
the crew dropping two 500-pound bombs on five U.S. soldiers, two Green Berets
and three accompanying soldiers.
Some had warned this might happen. Several
lawmakers, including Senate Armed Services Committee members Kelly Ayotte and
John McCain, have criticized the Air Force for its decision last year to retire
all A-10 Warthogs, the only aircraft devoted to close air support and a weapon
loved by the infantry.
Mr. McCain became incensed when he learned one of the
A-10 replacements was the B-1B, saying the wide-winged aircraft was totally
unsuited for close air support's requirement to sort out friendlies from the
enemy in crowded combat.

No comments:
Post a Comment