According to an article published in
Forbes by Alex Berezow in 2014, the belief that humans were unique
because we could think is being turned upside down.
Koko the gorilla knows sign language, and Alex the parrot was probably the most well-spoken bird to have ever existed. Also, a chimpanzee was trained to use Arabic symbols to add up sums as large as 4, and monkeys were taught to add dots together.
But that’s all child’s play; monkeying around, if you will. Now, PNAS reports that a team of Harvard and Yale researchers has trained rhesus macaque monkeys to recognize two sets of symbols, with 26 symbols in each set. And the monkeys demonstrated an ability to add them together!
The monkeys were given a touch-screen device that was divided in two halves. In the first stage of the experiment, the monkeys had to determine which side had the greater amount. First, they had to examine dots.
Second, they had to examine Arabic numerals (1-9) or letters (which represented numbers 10-25). Finally, they had to examine Tetris-like symbols which represented numerical values.
To keep the monkeys playing, they were given drops of liquid treats that corresponded to the value they chose, regardless of whether they picked the right answer. (For example, if the choice is between 4 and 8 and the monkey picked 4, he would get four drops.)
Obviously, larger values mean more treats, so the monkeys had an incentive to learn how to recognize the larger value.
I see 3 issues happening here:
The first is this concept of using
reinforcement to learn
The second is that human are not as
unique as we thought
How we have been taught to think is
flawed
Education and Power
level then tilt the playing fields.
High IQ's lay the foundation for
potential leaps in knowledge and no one can doubt that but without
the proper personalities those high IQ's could just simply amount to
nothing more than a “class clown” or a “disruptive influence”
on society or both.
I believe that those with high IQ's
must be directed.
On the other side of the coin is EQ
which deals with the emotions and it is said that these types of
people make good leaders as most good leaders when analyzed possess
high amounts of this EQ. And, while that too is all fine and good,
it must also be directed.
John Lennon once said: “Life
happens when we are making other plans,” hence the need for
direction.
If someone has either or both a high IQ
and EQ then they have a high degree of probability that their gifts
could be tapped appropriately. But, there are no guarantees.
We are a group of culturally diverse
individuals living in various locations all over our world where much
of the land is separated by water and mountains. And, the two
commodities that make us great in our own unique ways are either
EDUCATION or POWER or in some cases both.
We can compete with the “big
boys,” if we have one or the other or both, and this is exactly
what the “big boys” do not want to have happen on our
world.
Who are these “big boys,”
you ask?
And, my response (a little touchy and
sarcastic) is, “does it matter?” And
that, you must admit is very close to who
cares...
So, what is wrong with our educational system(s) here in American and
no doubt elsewhere when scientist with all their high IQ's can teach
monkeys to learn what no one prior to this time thought they could
learn, and we cannot properly teach our own children to learn without
a struggle that is typical futile in nature?
What is wrong with we are doing or not doing?
In Biblical times, the people talked in parables and UNDERSTOOD and
when we teach those same parables in our Sunday Schools, the kids
just look at us in disbelief asking for clarification as to what it
means and how it relates now.
Of course, this is not everybody in every Sunday School class....
but, the point is that it is happening more than you think or
realize.
If they cannot understand the Biblical parables what chance do they
have of understanding problem solving, critical thinking, or complex
linear equations or algorithms?
So here is my question again: How can monkey be taught to learn and
we teachers have trouble getting our students to learn?
And, we cannot say that if we had
better students, it would change because if we had better students we
would then need better teachers because the better students would not
be satisfied with what was there.
The sad part here is that many educators will never believe the
totality of that statement as it pertains to them.
And, that leaves POWER...
If you are a believer in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering,
Math) education then you could make a solid case for the concept that
Power is derived from those with a high level of STEM education under
their belts, whether or not that also have high IQ's and/or EQ's.
Yes, most of us would agree with that, but...
Power is derived from force and especially brute force when applied
correctly. Power always defeats a lesser force who may have an
uncanny desire to survive.
All we have to do here is read a little about military conquests
going back several centuries and moving forward to today's date.
It is true that smaller armies have held larger armies at bay for
unbelievable amounts of time that no one would have imagined could
have happened... but, in the end, the larger force or POWER wins
all the time.
If we can teach monkeys to think, do you think we could teach them to
fight for us one day? I doubt that would ever happen, but more
realistically would be the notion that we will one day develop
warrior robots to fight for us.
And, when and if we ever get to that place in life, we will have much
more time to spend training monkeys to learn to out think us.
No comments:
Post a Comment