The gap in employment rates between America's
highest- and lowest-income families has stretched to its widest levels since
officials began tracking the data a decade ago, according to an analysis of
government data conducted for The Associated Press.
Rates of unemployment for the lowest-income families
- those earning less than $20,000 - have topped 21 percent, nearly matching the
rate for all workers during the 1930s Great Depression.
U.S. households with income of more than $150,000 a
year have an unemployment rate of 3.2 percent, a level traditionally defined as
full employment. At the same time, middle-income workers are increasingly
pushed into lower-wage jobs. Many of them in turn are displacing lower-skilled,
low-income workers, who become unemployed or are forced to work fewer hours,
the analysis shows.
"This was no `equal opportunity' recession or
an `equal opportunity' recovery," said Andrew Sum, director of the Center
for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University. "One part of America
is in depression, while another part is in full employment."
The findings follow the government's tepid jobs
report this month that showed a steep decline in the share of Americans working
or looking for work. On Sunday, President Barack Obama stressed the need to
address widening inequality, warning that proposed budget cuts will worsen the
gap.
"The folks in the middle and at the bottom
haven't seen wage or income growth," Obama recently said on ABC's "This
Week."
While the link between income and joblessness may
seem apparent, the data are the first to establish how this factor has
contributed to the erosion of the middle class, a traditional strength of the
U.S. economy.
Based on employment-to-population ratios, which are
seen as a reliable gauge of the labor market, the employment disparity between
rich and poor households remains at the highest levels in more than a decade,
the period for which comparable data are available.
"It's pretty frustrating," says Annette
Guerra, 33, of San Antonio, who has been looking for a full-time job since she
finished nursing school more than a year ago. During her search, she found that
employers had become increasingly picky about an applicant's qualifications in
the tight job market, often turning her away because she lacked previous
nursing experience or because she wasn't certified in more areas.
Guerra says she now gets by doing "odds and
ends" jobs such as a pastry chef, bringing in $500 to $1,000 a month, but
she says daily living can be challenging as she cares for her mother, who has
end-stage kidney disease.
"For those trying to get ahead, there should be
some help from government or companies to boost the economy and provide people
with the necessary job training," says Guerra, who hasn't ruled out
returning to college to get a business degree once her financial situation is
more stable. "I'm optimistic that things will start to look up, but it's
hard."
Last year the average length of unemployment for
U.S. workers reached 39.5 weeks, the highest level since World War II. The
duration of unemployment has since edged lower to 36.5 weeks based on data from
January to July, still relatively high historically.
Economists call this a "bumping down" or
"crowding out" in the labor market, a domino effect that pushes out lower-income
workers, pushes median income downward and contributes to income inequality.
Because many mid-skill jobs are being lost to globalization and automation,
recent U.S. growth in low-wage jobs has not come fast enough to absorb
displaced workers at the bottom.
